Essay on Croatia's accession to the EU.

Could you take an in-depth look at what I have written to pick up any errors?

Croatia’s accession process to the European Union.
The European Union currently consists of 27 member states but it is still willing to get new members whose capabilities would make this organization stronger and more effective in terms of dealing with the problems the UE is facing. It goes without saying that it is Croatia that really stands out among other would-be UE members and its full entry into this organization might well be only a question of time.
Although the establishment of diplomatic relations between Brussels and Zagreb dates back to 1992, the formal opening of accession talks took place in 2005. It was followed by the screening process during which Croatian law had to be customized to the law existing within the borders of the European Union. Once the above-mentioned process had been completed, there were a number of other fields (called chapters) on which Croatia was obliged to work. Firstly, this country focused on the chapter concerning science and research and these negotiations were closed in 2006. Secondly, intellectual property was taken an in-depth look at by Croatian lawmakers. This process was followed by the opening of other chapters, the most important of which were chapters on financial and budgetary provisions and energy and transport policy. In general, 30 out 35 chapters have been opened so far, of which eighteen have been partially approved by the European Union. On the 9th of December 2011 the accession treaty was signed and from that moment on the possibility of Croatia’s joining the European Union has been far more realistic. Since Croatia applied for its UE membership there have been a number of referendums trying to evaluate Croatian people’s stance on whether this country should become a member of the EU or not. In spite of the fact that citizens’ support always fluctuates from 55% to 65 %, what we find alarming is that every referendum has a very poor turnout rating, which can be caused by omnipresent disappointment at the policy pursued by the current government.
Although Croatia’s accession is foreseen for 1 July 2013 ( unless any member state votes against) there are a lot of problems that prevent both the European Union and Croatia from being entirely positive about the EU enlargement. First of all, the European Union is going through a difficult period of disunity and financial uncertainty, which makes it harder to welcome next Balkan states with arms open. As a result, European leaders are more interested in taking care of their countries rather than in working on further Balkan enlargement. What is more, there have been numerous politicians expressing their concerns about Croatia’s accession. According to them, such a move could only spark off a conflict in the Balkan region. Even though Croatia has successfully managed to meet the EU requirements, concerns remain with regard to its financial condition, corruption vulnerability, competitiveness and sustainability. Croatia’s neighbors also seem to be anxious about potential changes triggered by Croatia’s membership. In addition to positive alternations, there might be some obstacles in trade or political relations and this is what they are fearful of. According to experts, it is Bosnia and Herzegovina that can be the most affected in the event of its neighbor’s entering into the European Union. This country is extremely dependent on Croatian goods and mutual trade is thriving. However, after Croatia has become the EU member only goods complying with the EU standards will be allowed to be exchanged. Furthermore, Croatia will have to abandon the multilateral agreement on free regional trade, which can spell a disaster on Croatia’s economic relations with other Balkan states.

The European Union currently consists of 27 member states but it is still willing to 'get' (kolokw w tym tekscie - poszukaj inne slowo) new members whose capabilities would make this organization stronger and more effective in terms of dealing with the problems THAT the UE is (currently?) facing. 'It goes without saying' (tego nie pisz, to jest twoja opinias nie fakt-napisz to inaczej) that it is Croatia that really stands out among other would-be UE members and its full entry into this organization might well be only a question of time.
Once the' above-mentioned' (to mi za bardzo wyglada po polsku - wystarczy 'this process) process had been completed, there were a number of other fields (called chapters) on which Croatia was obliged to work. Firstly, 'this country' (nieladnie, 'napisz 'the') focused on the chapter concerning science and research and these negotiations were closed in 2006. Secondly, intellectual property was 'taken an in-depth look' (investigated in-depth) 'at' (niepotr) by Croatian lawmakers.
On the 9th of December 2011 the accession treaty was signed and from that moment on the possibility of 'Croatia’s' (tutaj normalnie Croatia) joining the European Union has been far more realistic.
Although Croatia’s accession is foreseen for 1 July 2013 (unless any member state votes against) there are 'a lot' (nie pasuje tutaj, zly register, napisz 'numerous') problems that prevent both the European Union and Croatia from being entirely positive about the EU enlargement. First of all, the European Union is going through a difficult period of disunity and financial uncertainty, which makes it harder to welcome THE next Balkan states with arms open. As a result, European leaders are more interested in taking care of their countries rather than in working on furtherING 'Balkan enlargement' (nie, to jest zle, bo wyglada tak, jakby bylo powiekszego Balkan states). What is more, 'there have been' (niepotr) numerous politicians expressED their concerns about Croatia’s accession.
In addition to positive 'alternations' (nie, poszukaj inne slowo), there might be some obstacles in trade or political relations and this is what they are fearful of. According to THE experts, it is Bosnia and Herzegovina that 'can' MAY be the most affected in the event of its neighbor’s 'entering' ENTRY into the European Union.
Furthermore, Croatia will have to abandon the multilateral agreement on free regional trade, which can spell 'a' (niepotr) disaster on Croatia’s economic relations with other Balkan states.

Dziękuję.

On the possibility of 'Croatia’s' (tutaj normalnie Croatia) joining the European Union has been far more realistic. - no właśnie jak to jest bo na przykład piszemy tak: There is some merit in my fasting. albo There is no harm in their going to the disco. Więc według mojego rozumowania też powinno odnosić się to do innego objektów np. There is no harm in Ukraine's attempting to dispose of nuclear weapons. A może powinno być There is no harm in Ukraine attempting...?

On the possibility of 'Croatia’s' (tutaj normalnie Croatia) joining the European Union has been far more realistic. - 'Croatia's' (zawsze sobie powiedz ...belong to Croatia jak masz apostroph..wtedy jest jasniej zrozumiec...Croatia's land....
np. There is no harm in Ukraine's 'attempting' (widze, gdzie sie mylisz, jak chcesz napisac Ukraine'S to musi byc ATTEMPTS...Poland's attempts, ale Poland attempting to....) to dispose of nuclear weapons.

Tak, teraz już wiem wszystko:-) Myślałem , że z Gerundem te bedzie apostrof:-)

There is some merit in my fasting - tutaj "my" tez odnosi sie do posiadania, dlatego myslalem, ze inne obiekty tez w ten sposob dzialaja.