Recently, (brak przedimka) arrival of imigrants to Europe is a very controversial topic. The cause of these disscusions are terrorist 'attacs' (ortog), which had (dodaj tu slowo 'taken') 'a' (niepotrzebne slowo) place in many European countries. People 'belive' (ortog) that terrorists came to our territory on the pretext of beeing refugees. Europeans live in fear and because of that, reflections on advantages and 'desadvantages' (ortog) of closing borders to mass imigration are of daily occurrence.
Supporters of 'prohibition crossing our borders' (to jest za bardzo po polsku, calkowicie tego nie rozumiem) by imigrants are mostly people who feel threatENED of them.
Putting aside (przedimek) 'attacs' (ortog) of 'terrorits' (ortog), there are other negative results. Imigrants could contribute to (przedimek) increase of crimes or unemployment. It is also hard to provide them (brak slowa) accomodation or access to education.
They are people who are looking for a safe place for themSELVES and their families.
From an ethical point of view Europeans can’t just 'ignorate' (ortog) them. It is also important to mention that history has a 'big' (staraj sie nigdy nie uzywac tego slowa, tutaj np. 'great') influence over people'S thinking. In past, (przedimek) families of many people were forced to leave their 'hometown' (nie, lepsze slowo homelands) because of war. People start to 'indentify' (ortog) with refugees and intent to help them.
Taking everything into consideration, (brak przedimka) intention of closing borders is justified, but not completly. In my opinion, we should 'remeber' (ortog) that imigrants are people like us. We can’t 'follow' (nie za bardzo, moze 'be ruled') by stereotypes and we should try to help them.