Poniżej zamieszczam próbkę do tłumaczenia z zagadnienia: 'Zasada negatywnej selekcji związana ze skutkami zawarcia umowy.' Wszystkie przetłumaczone próbki zostaną przez ze mnie przeanalizowane dlatego tez prosiłbym osoby zainteresowane tłumaczeniem o podanie kwoty za tłumaczenie w sumie 5 stron podobnego tekstu.
(a) The acceptor has positive probability of accepting without reading in any equilibrium in which offers are made. Otherwise, the misleading offeror would never offer a clause, which would make the acceptor want to deviate to accepting.
(b) There cannot be a separating equilibrium in pure strategies. It cannot be an equilibrium for the sincere offeror to offer and the misleading offeror not to offer, because then the acceptor would accept without reading, giving the misleading offeror an incentive to offer. It cannot be an equilibrium for the sincere offeror not to offer and the misleading offeror to offer, because then the acceptor would reject without reading and the misleading offeror would deviate to not offering.
(c) If the acceptor mixes between reading and accepting outright, the sincere offeror will offer with probability one. That is because his offer will be accepted either outright or after being read.
(d) The acceptor will not mix between reading and rejecting. Then the misleading offeror would never offer, leading to case (b).
This leaves us with four equilibria. Two varieties are pooling equilibria, in which either both types of offeror offer clauses or both do not offer them. The other two are partially separating equilibria, in which the two types of offerors choose different mixing probabilities and the acceptor mixes either between reading and accepting or between rejecting and accepting.
THE GOOD POOLING EQUILIBRIUM (if γ ≥ M ax(ymy+mys,1 −ycmr ) )
Offerors: Both types of offeror make offers. Acceptor: The acceptor accepts without reading.