>How is it that in the middle of a perfectly "normal" conversation about my >inherent shyness you can segue into/shanghai the thread and discuss "hustler" layouts???
I’m sorry dear if my smutty remark was embrrassingly close to home.
Never have I meant to rub your intrinsic reticence, which is not emotionally pious I hope.:) But you know, in years to come the multiplicity of different factors will surely bring home to someone the whole hypocritical pietism that is foisted on us every single day. Don’t say this, don’t say that and so on because, quote "it may easily be misconstrued by an honest man”:)),close quote. In fact, I think the opposite is true. Nor am I deviant to devest (fig. :) or denude ? the impostorus ”norm” but rather bored ”tarantinized”(Qeuntin made me coin it:)and ordinarily Mr. Average who knows "where somebody is coming from". While some would eagerly profile me otherwise but I let them jump in a lake :)
But I shall return to the matter from which I have much digressed I guess.:)
The Hustler ”theme” was let slip quite inadvertently to merely draw my somewhat clumsy parallel (I would very readily concede to my but still ”smallest” swerving in this regard :) to the fact that by discovering more about the particular field you ‘re in, and pursuing your cognitive semantic postulate, you finally learn that approppritae form of interpretation. But nobody should be under any illusion that language nativilty is determining and finally fixes an issue.:))
A trully philosophical point which can't be appreciated by those "obatomised" optimists.(no pun intended).
P.S.I don't claim to be the only one who thinks the above way.:)