In XXI century it 'bacame' (ortog) really serious and widespread bacause
people realized that all THE Earth's REsources will 'finished' (tutaj czas teraz) some day and they are guilty 'for' (dlaczego 'for'-dla a nie cos innego) this proccess. The hole in THE ozone layer is bigger,(bigger than what? moze lepiej..is getting bigger) temperature is warmer, the sea level is higher and 'others' (nie, tutaj OTHER) ''negtive' (ortog) phenomena in nature' (cos tu nie tak). What are THE causes of such disaster? How can (ale kto?) prevent
it?
Firstly, there are plenty of reasons why 'the' (niepotr) environmental pollution
exists. The main and essential (ale co? essential co?) is 'a human's' (tutaj piszesz o l. poj - ale nas jest wiecej na swiecie) existence. We can divide
'an' THE 'environmenatl' (ortog) pollution 'on' (znowu ta kalka z polskiego 'na' - tutaj INTO pollution of air, earth and sea. The first one is caused for instance by using areosols which consist OF harmful and dangerous substances, driving cars, smoking cigarettes. 'Another' THE OTHER one by deforestation, no 'receycling' (ortog), throwing away 'rubish' (ortog),
using fertilizers and 'others' (nie, nie pisz 'others, napisz and OTHER harmful substances). The last one 'is existed' (nie, tutaj EXISTS because people
use ships to export goods and other people to different places and
some of THE ships may be damaged by weather conditions and then 'an' (niepotr)oil leaks are created which not only pollute sea water but also kill
animals. 'There' THESE are only some of THE examples of destroying the environment by human beings.
To protect and also prevent 'it' (a tutaj 'it' do czego sie odnosi) from disaster we should recycle, use bicycleS instead of cars, do not use 'areolsols' (ortog) and other substances which have 'got' (niepotr) A bad impact on THE natural habitat. We ought to remeber about both animals and plants because they are a part of our world and without THEM our life is impossible. What is more, it is a good idea to create more 'organistations' (ortog) such as Greenpeace which supports a fight with pollution and tries to protect our environment.
On balance, it 'is' (po co to 'is' tutaj?) only dependS on people, if we will live 'with' IN agreement 'of' WITH nature or we will destroy it 'what' (kalka z polskiego 'co' tutaj WHICH may 'have' (niepotr) bring us many negative aspects.
Popracuj nad 'the', 'a', i 'an'.