Essay on wasting food

Bardzo proszę o sprawdzenie tego eseju.

It is estimated that people throw away approximately 30% of the food they buy, while being still edible. There's an essential problem for the world, because whilst many people don't care about food at all and simply bin leftovers, others struggle to feed their families, or are permanently undernourished. In this essay I will discuss two changes, which I believe should be implemented, to tackle this burning issue.
The first of these is a change in approach to the food we buy and consume. Food should not be seen as a mere product we can buy; nor a thing that can be wasted. In fact, it may save lives. We could help the poorest by changing one, little thing: instead of throwing it away to the bin, give it to charity organizations that will then transfer it to the needy. You not only avoid doing a morally dreadful thing, which is to trash food, but also help the others.
The first change will not play out if the government doesn't change the legislation regarding food donation. Although it's an extreme absurd, some people have been prosecuted for food donation because of not paying appropriate tax, or on the grounds that someone has became sick having eaten the donated food. No one will donate their food, if they're threatened to be arraign. We should promote donations; however, we do everything opposite and therefore make them unexpectedly inconvenient.
In my opinion, if these two changes will turn out, we may step by step tackle this matter of malnutrition, which is unacceptable in the developed world. Once awareness of the food value has been raised together with adequately supporting legislation, the society might well abandon disposing food by either buying it less or giving away the abundance.

It is estimated that people throw away approximately 30% of the food they buy, while being still edible WYCHODZI NA TO, ZE LUDZIE SA JADALNI - ZMIEN TO. There's JAKI? CHODZIŁO O 'THIS IS'? an essential problem for< - IN the world, because whilst many people don't care about food at all and simply bin leftovers, others struggle to feed their families, or are ZNOWU - KTO? WYCHODZI, ZE 'OTHERS' permanently undernourished. In this essay I will discuss two changes, which I believe should be implemented,BEZ PRZECINKA to tackle this burning issue.
The first of these is a change in approach to the food we buy and consume. Food should not be seen as a mere product we can buy; nor a thing that can be wasted. In fact, it may save lives. We could help the poorest by changing one, little thing: instead of throwing it away to the bin, DAJ TUTAJ 'WE CAN' give it to charity organizations that will then transfer it to the needy. You not only avoid doing a morally dreadful thing, which is to trash food, but also help the others.
The first change will not play out if the government doesn't change the legislation regarding food donation. Although it's an extreme absurd, some people have been prosecuted for food donation because of not paying appropriate tax, or on the grounds that someone has became< -HAS BECOME sick having eaten the donated food. No one will donate their food, if they're threatened to be arraign< --CO?. We should promote donations; however, we do everything opposite and therefore make them unexpectedly inconvenient.
In my opinion, if these two changes will TO JEST WARUNEK, TUTAJ NIE BEDZIE 'WILL' turn out, we may step by step tackle this matter of malnutrition, which is unacceptable in the developed world. Once awareness of the food value has been raised together with adequately supporting legislation, the society might well abandon disposing food by either buying it less or giving away the abundance.

Dodam jeszcze:

don't - czy formy sciagniete (isn't, don't) sa dopuszczalne?
others struggle to feed their families, USUN TYLKO TEN PRZECINEK. or are permanently undernourished. In this essay I will discuss two changes, which I believe should be implemented, to tackle this burning issue.W TYM ZDANIU PRZECINKI TYLKO WOKOL 'I BELIEVE'
The first of these is a change in approach to the food we buy and consume. Food should not be MERELY seen as a mere product we can buy; nor WLASNIE ZROBILES PODWOJNE PRZECZENIE. USUN TEZ SREDNIK LUB ZROB OSOBNE ZDANIE Z 'NOR' I Z ORZECZENIEM a thing that can be wasted. In fact, it may save lives. We could help the poorest by changing one, USUN PRZECINEK little thing: instead of throwing it away to the bin, give it to charity organizations WYSTARCZY 'CHARITIES' that PRZECINEK I WHICH, PRZECIEZ NIE MOWISZ 'TYLKO DO TYCH ORGANIZACJI, KTORE...' will then transfer it to the needy. BRAKUJE: W TEN SPOSOB, TYM SAMYM ITP.You not only avoid doing a morally dreadful thing, which is to trash food, but also help the others.
Although it's an extreme absurd --TO SLOWO JEST PRAWIE ZAWSZE PRZYMIOTNIKIEM, some people have been prosecuted for food donation because of not paying appropriate tax, or on the grounds that someone has became sick having eaten the donated food. No one will donate their food, USUN PRZECINEK if they're threatened to be arraign. We should promote donations; however, we do everything THE opposite and therefore make them unexpectedly PRZESUN TO SLOWO PRZED MAKE? inconvenient.
In my opinion, if these two changes will turn out, we may step by step tackle this matter of malnutrition, which is unacceptable in the developed world. Once awareness of the food value has been raised together with adequately supporting - JAKA TO JEST CZESC MOWY? legislation, the society might well abandon disposing food by either buying it less (OF IT) or giving away the abundance=OBFITOSC, A CHCESZ NAPISAC 'NADMIAR'.

Dziękuję.

Food should not be seen as a mere product we can buy; nor a thing that can be wasted

W sumie to mam pytanie odnosnie tego zdania. mg napisał, że jest to podwójne przeczenie, ale czy nie jest tak, że po średniku mamy już jakby odrębne zdanie?

Czy taka wersja jest poprawna:
Food should not be merely seen as a product we can buy, nor a thing that can be wasted.

zmien nor na or

zeby po średniku było osobne zdanie, musi byc osobny czasownik