Hej, bardzo proszę o wytłumaczenie mi kilku[nastu] błędów, które popełniłam na wypracowaniu, a nie mogę zapytać nauczycielki bo jest na zwolnieniu i mamy zastępstwa. Jest to rozprawka za i przeciw wprowadzeniu zakazu wjazdu samochodów do centrów miast.
W nawiasach lub przez podkreślenie będę oznaczała, gdzie mam błędy.
Nowadays (tutaj taki ptaszek, jaki czegoś brakowało) everyone can have an auto. Cars are (drugi ptaszek) important part of
human's(to słowo podkreślone) life and many people
can not(podkreślenie) imagine a day without it. Travelling by
a(podkreślenie) car is fast and comfortable, but (ptaszek) definitely is not eco-friendly. This is why some people want cars to be banned from
drive(podkreślenie) into the city centres.
Of course, if
this (podkr) restriction comes to life, it will
be linked with city(podkreślone falowaną linią) communication system. The buses and trains would
be(podkr) probably
endless on late in(podkreślone prostą i falistą linią) due to an enormous
amount of people
whose want to travel fast. The buses and
the trains would be crowded and travelling by them would not be so comfortable as driving a car.
On the other
side (ptaszek) banning
the cars from
drive into (ptaszek)
city heart would be very healthy
to the environment. I think that
a significant
carbon reduction could be
noted into a cities centres and air would be more clean without the
pollutions produced by
the cars.
Another advantage of this soultion is that without
the cars, people would
started riding
on the bikes or
running for their workplaces. These activities could have a great influence on the problem of increase amount of obese people. (pochyła kursywa to falowana linia)
To sum up, in my opinion cars should be banned from
drive into the city centres, because it would be the best solution
for the problem of air pollution and it would make people
be more active.
Możecie mi wyjaśnić dlaczego mam te wszystkie podkreślenia i ptaszki? Byłabym bardzo wdzięczna!