Sara

na opakowaniach gum do żucia jest często napisane \"free sugar\". Co to oznacza?

raczej \"sugar free\" - to znaczy bez cukru

free sugar oznacza m.in \"wolność dla cukru\", \"uwolnić cukier\"

chodzi tu o nową kampanię Dżordża B.,-na różnych prodktach umieszczone zostały hasła rewolucyjne nawołujące pracowników upadających ostatnio cukrowni do powstania.heja ho!free sugar,uwolnijmy cukier tkwiący w burakach!no a żeby było jeszcze coś po angielsku to zaśpiewajmy:\"sugar, nananana,you are my candy girl..\"

tape - you made me laugh! cheers mate! have a nice evening!

It doesn\'t sound like a good advertising. \"Free sugar\" sounds almost like your product conatains sugar so go ahead and enjoy it for free? That\'s against everything I have seen so far on any food products.

Termin \"free sugar\" jest znacznie wcześniejszy, niz kolega tape tutaj imputuje, i ma ścisle naukowe podłoże, związane z prowadzonymi od lat na szerka skalę, badaniami nad zawartością cukru w cukrze. W wyniku przeprowadzanych masowo doswiadczeń, udowodniono, że w sprzyjającym środowisku dwutlenku wodoru i pewnych gatunków drożdzy, cząsteczki cukru uwalniają się z quantum cukru i stają się aktywne, a ich zachowanie skutkuje burzliwym oprocesem chemicznym, o społecznie pożytecznym znaczeniu. W pewnych kręgach, tak pojmowana wolnośc cukru stała sie wręcz synonimem wolnosci osobistej, chociaz trzeba to przyznać, ze nastąpiła derywacja skutków od przyczyn i mało kto utożsamia sobie dzisiaj, ze za tak pojmowaną jego wolnością, stoi własnie w pierwszym rzędzie wolnościowa natura cukru. Kolega tape ma elementarne braki w wiedzy o przedmiocie.

Ha, have you heard about Mr ATkins and others???? Only carbohydrates are causing fat building in the body... So Atkins could have commercials about products with free sugar :-) :-) :-) And Free Fat :-)

mmmm..... a glass of lard for breakfast!

basically - yes. Atkins diet is based on minimalization of carbohydrates consumption - their level indicates to the body if we are starving or not. If there is deficit then body starts to burn the fat that is accumulated, and if additionally you eat fat things as lard the body has to use more energy to burn them - so it is double burning :-) I haven\'t tried that one but accordingly to researches people on this diet lost as much kgs as people on other \"helathy\" diets... One small \"catch\" - you can be on Aykins diet only for one month - then ou have to take a break... Later you can get back but you never cannot be on this constantly... I still prefer my veges/ fruits and climbing few times to the 24 floor by stairs to eating fatty greasy lumps of food :-) I am not fat-fast-foody person :-) Kill McDonald !!!! :-) :-) :-)

You can stay on Atkins as long as you want. The \"Induction Period\" usually lasts two weeks and you can\'t go over 20 carbs a day. This is the time when you lose a lot of your weight. You have to follow the carb counter very closely (pain in the neck) every time you eat something. Down the road you are allowed to increase your carbs only to a certain level. You introduce them gradually checking at the same time whether you still keep losing weight. You will find out, for example, that after you hit 45 carbs a day, that\'s it for you or you will start gaining weight. A slice of bread is 20 carbs....two slices...you figure. How long can you live like that? I tried that and failed miserably! To make matters worse, you will gain it all back PLUS!
I did!
Back to the tread mill and nice walks. Exercise works best!

BTW. did you know Mr Atkins (bless his soul) was overwieght when he died?

I don\'t think carbohydrates alone make us fat. We need carbohydrates just like we need proteins, fruits, vegetables and dairy products. What Mr. Atkins figured was that if we get rid of all carbohydrates (or keep them to a dull roar), the body will start going after its own body fat for energy rather than burning clucose which is part of all carbohydrates).

What i know it is recommended not to be all the time - it could make solme damages - i am not sure but it makes some bad changes in your liver if you are constantly on this diet... NAyway i think if your diet i(n proper meaning of this word ie diet = way of eating not diet= way of eating to lose weight) is healthy and well ballanced with excercises such as my own climbing 24 floor :-P you shouldn\'t have any problems with weight... If you still have it you should see a doctor. I know that in Poland there are some nutritionists in the public hospitals...
About Mr Atkins - i didn\'t know about it - i only know that some scientists would be very happy to examine his body but Mr A didn\'t leave any permission for that :-) So there are still people for and against this diet... As with every diet... As my nutitionist at school used o say: Carrot is the elementary food for your diet!!!!!! Whatever - she was a bit of overenthusiastic :-) More excercising and eating plants :-) RIP for Mr A :-)
BTW - i read long time ago about some curious and maybe the best diet (????? maybe time to check it...) called let your body spek or something like that... You should not eat anything for the week or bit more and then try bits and pieces - your body should get some kind of cravings - like in pregnancy - for some specific foods and their amounts. So bosy should indicate what it needs and how much... So if you feel like apple you should eat it but only till you are not hungry anymore - even if there is still half of the apple left... I am not feeling like THIS diet right now :-)
Cheers

well - i just made a shortcut - of course we need carbs... Well the rest i told as it should be.. Anyay i am not convinced it is healthy to minimalize carbs and increase fat consumption... People should think every day what they are eating and not starting a diet after for example 6 months of eating fast food, drinking loads of coffee, be on a diet for a 2 months and after that coming back to previuos way of eating - that\'s stupid.... And frustrating...
Cheerio :-)

I agree. Diets just don\'t work. You deprive your body of one thing or another and it\'s impossible to gainsay our nature. In the aftermath it all works against our bodies and we end up gaining even more weight!

Exercise and common sense when it comes to eating is all we need.

cheers

Right you are... From time to time it is very healthy to do \"glodowki\" - but only because our bowels needs to be cleaned thoroughly... If i feel like chicken tonight i will be eating it - the point is in not doing it everyday... and not thw whole chicken!!!!! Occasionally it cannot hurt us... And besides if you prepare your own meal you know the ingredients and you are loosing callories - it is kind of excercise - and sauna if you use your oven :-P
So no more carbs counting :-) Just turn on the brain i say :-)

Free sugar to znaczy bez cukru

Your scientific theory merits some thought, but it may be possible that economic considerations may be at the root of this serious matter. "Free sugar" may be less costly, and thus result in a more competitively priced product. We must evaluate the question: is the sugar of a controlled, or uncontrolled origin? Indeed, if the product containing the "free sugar" is of Indian production, then I cite the following:

In an interview with Mr Prayesh Jain, Mr Debjyoit Chatterjee and Mr Laxmikant Khanvilkar of India Infoline Ltd, Mr Naiknavare talks to us about the dynamics of the sugar industry and its prospects.

Sugar being an essential commodity carries a lot of importance, however, given the governments decision to slowly free the sugar from its clutches is impacting its production. Your comments please.

Sugar has been an essential commodity for two reasons. One it is a very essential and critical part of our daily diet. Second, sugar per se is not consumed to a large extent. Institutional demand nearly accounts for two-third of the total consumption. Hence, it continues to remain an essential commodity. However, the Government is planning to free the distribution of sugar. Currently, Government has a decisive role in distribution of sugar across the country. The expectation that decontrol shall take place in October 2005 are now void, as the production of sugar, which was down by 30% this year, is likely to fall further as the sugarcane producing areas have received lower rainfall. Going ahead the sugar industry will have to be decontrolled. Our contention on the subject is that scrapping of Release Mechanism be done in phased manner and in conjuncture with Sugar Trading in Forward and Future market.

If we look at the history, in times of drought, sugar has never been on the priority list of the Government, as sugarcane production requires a lot of water. Consequently, the sugarcane producing regions do not get adequate attentions as other daily essentials such as Water, Rice, Wheat etc in that order, gets a top priority.

http://www.indiainfoline.com/view/030105.html