Who was it attacked the victims? - jak to będzie w stronie czynnej?

Temat przeniesiony do archwium.
31-34 z 34
| następna
pomieniecie raczej zalezy od funcji jaka pełni 'relative pronoun, to widac na przykladach.
Jak jest dopełnieniem to juz inna sprawa' Guys ( that) I visit
'that' robi za 'object' of 'visit', jak zrobimy z tego pytanie to to 'that' mozna pominac, that's the test
Cytat: savagerhino
pomieniecie raczej zalezy od funcji jaka pełni 'relative pronoun, to widac na przykladach.
Jak jest dopełnieniem to juz inna sprawa' Guys ( that) I visit
'that' robi za 'object' of 'visit', jak zrobimy z tego pytanie to to 'that' mozna pominac, that's the test

to prawda, ze mozna tutaj swobodnie te that pominac, i wszystko bedzie zachowane pod wzgledem gramatyki i rejestru
...which means Syntax may have some' rudimentary' or intrinsic qualities to our language, or maybe even to our very existence.
Just to make it clear, ok. I’m talking about the evangelic entities I’ve been in contact for some time now. Really, I’m not shitting. Look, whatever you do, syntax is there waiting ‘for you’. You want to shake hands with your wife’s best friend ( take a piss:) , syntax is there. You go take a squat ( that’s a ‘number two’ thing), there’s is ‘some’ order during the process, right ? I’ve come to the conclusion that, in fact , syntax is in our behinds in much the same way as it is in the universe. :)

p.s. ..and to think that I didn’t take anything today, ..yet, I hasten to add.
I can't do no rhymes today ..because I'm channeling my cosmic energy through the universe
edytowany przez savagerhino: 27 lut 2012
31-34 z 34
| następna